Readable
The draft shows what information was used and where it came from.
Automating customer service doesn’t mean letting AI answer every ticket unchecked. Often the better start is: read the request, look for context, create a draft answer, let people decide.
A digital support employee reduces research, FAQ handling, and preparation work without letting sensitive answers, edge cases, or customer data slip out of control.
A lot of time is lost before a response is written: searching for old tickets, checking customer data, reading internal rules, gathering context from multiple systems.
Not a chatbot that has to answer everything.
Many support projects start with the wrong expectation: the AI should immediately answer every request itself. This seems simple in a demo and quickly becomes risky in operation.
A digital support agent can first start as a research and draft system. If certain types of requests are stable, more will be automated. Everything else remains with humans.
When questions clearly recur, a digital support employee can take on more responsibility: identify FAQs, provide appropriate answers, and escalate anything outside the scope.
This works particularly well when knowledge sources are clean and the team has defined which answers may be automated.
Sam creates answer drafts with the research context.
Sam works in a ticketing system. It reads a request, looks for the required context across multiple systems, and creates a draft response. To do this, it provides the research result so that a human can check and send the answer.
Source and category are defined in the pipeline.
What is being asked, what is context, what is open?
Knowledge base, CRM, contract and order data, old tickets.
This makes it clear where the information comes from.
For FAQ cases, approval can be automated later.
Sam is not an autopilot in this setup. Above all, Sam takes the search work off the team.
Especially in support you want to see what happens: Which request was read? What context was found? What does the digital employee suggest? Why was it escalated?
The draft shows what information was used and where it came from.
People make decisions when there is risk, uncertainty, or edge cases.
Logs and escalations make work traceable for each case.
Security belongs in the workflow.
A digital support employee works with customer data. That is why it needs boundaries.
Backend and used LLMs run in the EU.
Per system, per data type and task.
Every source read, every draft, and every escalation is traceable.
Standard for risk, edge cases, and uncertain answers.
Customer data is not used to train third-party LLMs.
We explain the basic security architecture on the security page. The category behind it is described under digital employees.
This is what a first pilot can look like.
We start with a clear support workflow. The digital employee gets a name, a visible identity, access to the necessary knowledge sources, and an initial task in the ticket process.
The first step is not full automation. It is the recurring cases that can be drafted so cleanly that the team can review and send them with minimal changes.
Once the flow is stable, we expand: more FAQ cases, more channels, more automation. Step by step.
Yes, but not as an open autopilot. A good start is often a draft with research results. The team checks and sends the response. More automation comes later, once request type, knowledge source, and escalation rules are clear.
Recurring questions, clear FAQ cases, similarly structured inquiries, and tickets that require context from existing systems are well suited.
Many ticket systems can be connected if interfaces, data access, and rights are suitable. Current customer projects include Zendesk and Zoho Desk setups.
Through limited tasks, verified knowledge sources, draft responses instead of autopilot, escalation rules, audit logs, and human approval for risk cases.
If the case is outside the defined scope, data is missing, the answer is uncertain, or a decision requires human responsibility.
Customer data is not used to train third-party LLMs. The backend and deployed LLMs run in the EU. Specific data processing is documented for each setup.
Yuno asks four short questions about request volume, knowledge sources, risk cases, and approval. After that, it is clearer whether a support pilot makes sense.